|
Post by The Evergreen Republic on Aug 12, 2022 22:14:50 GMT
Just because Brad is founder does not mean when he is threatened that he can bring someone to court. Theoretically that could be considered Abuse of Power. Objection. Bringing forth charges against another is the right of any Assembly nation. In this sense, yes, I am bringing forth charges as an aggrieved party who is aware of what process to follow. Any nation has this right. Alleging abuse of power for New Bradfordsburg's exercising of Constitutionally afforded rights is slander and misinformed.
|
|
|
Post by The Evergreen Republic on Aug 12, 2022 22:24:34 GMT
We formally request to dismiss the misconduct charge. We object to this. We allege that Saint Jews committed misconduct and acted with malicious intent when this nation threatened to unleash their entire nuclear arsenal at New Bradfordsburg. This threat was issued by the nation's empress and is an unprecedented threat in Declansburg's RP. Saint Jews deliberately increased the likelihood of nuclear holocaust without regard in response to a conventional conflict. This is a malicious action that defies logic and acts against basic instincts of self-preservation, which could be see as intentionally trying to disrupt and damage the region's RP as an act of malice against the region at large. This charge was also unanimously supported by the Assembly in a vote.
|
|
|
Post by Korvalis on Aug 12, 2022 23:38:05 GMT
CBF's motion to dismiss the misconduct charge is denied.
Both of Evergreen's objections are sustained.
Moving on. Does either side have any witnesses they wish to testify in this case?
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Bears Fan on Aug 12, 2022 23:46:03 GMT
Just because Brad is founder does not mean when he is threatened that he can bring someone to court. Theoretically that could be considered Abuse of Power. Objection. Bringing forth charges against another is the right of any Assembly nation. In this sense, yes, I am bringing forth charges as an aggrieved party who is aware of what process to follow. Any nation has this right. Alleging abuse of power for New Bradfordsburg's exercising of Constitutionally afforded rights is slander and misinformed. Objection. I never brought forth charges against him, this is off topic and I want this taken off the records or whatever
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Bears Fan on Aug 12, 2022 23:47:40 GMT
We formally request to dismiss the misconduct charge. We object to this. We allege that Saint Jews committed misconduct and acted with malicious intent when this nation threatened to unleash their entire nuclear arsenal at New Bradfordsburg. This threat was issued by the nation's empress and is an unprecedented threat in Declansburg's RP. Saint Jews deliberately increased the likelihood of nuclear holocaust without regard in response to a conventional conflict. This is a malicious action that defies logic and acts against basic instincts of self-preservation, which could be see as intentionally trying to disrupt and damage the region's RP as an act of malice against the region at large. This charge was also unanimously supported by the Assembly in a vote. Objection. As stated he had no malicious intent whatsoever and it was just hollow threats to get rid of you. There is no malice involved at all so this is all redundant balony
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Bears Fan on Aug 12, 2022 23:55:13 GMT
I have no witnesses at this time.
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Bears Fan on Aug 13, 2022 0:01:15 GMT
Could we move this along to my next argument
|
|
|
Post by Korvalis on Aug 13, 2022 0:11:14 GMT
Both of CBF's objections are overruled. Both charges have been endorsed by the Assembly with unanimous votes, therefore it is the Assembly bringing forth the charges. Legal precedence: the charges against Grand Rotondia and the charges against Romanic Imperium, which were brought by Assembly nations.
CBF, proceed with your next argument please.
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Bears Fan on Aug 13, 2022 0:13:28 GMT
I call to the witness stand Korvalis
|
|
|
Post by Korvalis on Aug 13, 2022 0:22:36 GMT
Denied, I am the judge presiding over this case. If you want to bring me in as a witness, you may do so if the case is appealed to the Higher Circuit Court with the Prime Minister presiding over the case.
Does CBF have any other witnesses they wish to call?
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Bears Fan on Aug 13, 2022 0:24:46 GMT
I wish to appeal to higher court
|
|
|
Post by Korvalis on Aug 13, 2022 0:25:47 GMT
Article IV, Section IV
A charged party is given the right to a trial before the Lower Circuit Court, which shall consist of the Deputy Prime Minister. The Deputy Prime Minister shall find the charged party either guilty or innocent. Charges may also be dismissed.
|
|
|
Post by Korvalis on Aug 13, 2022 0:27:23 GMT
You may appeal to the higher court after the verdict.
|
|
|
Post by Korvalis on Aug 13, 2022 0:28:56 GMT
Does CBF have any other witnesses, or should we move on to Evergreen?
|
|
|
Post by Chicago Bears Fan on Aug 13, 2022 0:36:13 GMT
I want to address the godmodding part next. I'll allow brad to make the opening statement but I agree that Saint Jews naval and territorial stats were fake
|
|