|
|
Post by Odinburgh on Feb 23, 2022 16:17:26 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by The Evergreen Republic on Feb 23, 2022 18:09:42 GMT
As a clarification, was Grand Rotondia ever formally convicted? If he was, Shreminov would be handling the sentencing. However, that would only be after Parliament votes to hold a trial and said trial is held. If there is no conviction, and this measure is simply a reaction to the charges being brought that's different. Could we get clarification?
|
|
|
|
Post by Odinburgh on Feb 23, 2022 20:55:39 GMT
As a clarification, was Grand Rotondia ever formally convicted? If he was, Shreminov would be handling the sentencing. However, that would only be after Parliament votes to hold a trial and said trial is held. If there is no conviction, and this measure is simply a reaction to the charges being brought that's different. Could we get clarification? There was never a conviction as Rontondia stood down. I think we should consider a parliamentarian position. |
|
|
|
Post by Odinburgh on Feb 23, 2022 21:53:19 GMT
As a clarification, was Grand Rotondia ever formally convicted? If he was, Shreminov would be handling the sentencing. However, that would only be after Parliament votes to hold a trial and said trial is held. If there is no conviction, and this measure is simply a reaction to the charges being brought that's different. Could we get clarification? There was never a conviction as Rontondia stood down. I think we should consider a parliamentarian position. or least the dux should have parliamentarian duties. |
|
|
|
Post by Rantarod on Feb 24, 2022 0:30:57 GMT
Abstain
|
|
|
|
Post by Odinburgh on Feb 24, 2022 19:22:56 GMT
The vote is closed and censure is decision this body as come to. That be said GR can redeem himself as anyone else that I believe in second chances.
|
|
